AIRR - ANZCA Institutional Research Repository
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11055/220
Title: A prospective, observational study of the effects of implementation strategy on compliance with a surgical safety checklist.
Authors: Hannam, J A
Glass, L
Kwon, J
Windsor, J
Stapelberg, F
Callaghan, K
Merry, AF
Mitchell, SJ
ANZCA/FPM Author: Glass, L
Stapelberg, F
Merry, AF
Mitchell, SJ
Issue Date: Nov-2013
Citation: BMJ quality & safety 2013-11; 22(11): 940-7
Abstract: The reported benefits of using the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) are likely to depend on compliance with its correct use. Compliance with SSC administration in centres that have introduced the checklist under a research protocol may differ from centres where the SSC is introduced independently. To compare compliance with SSC administration at an original WHO pilot study centre (Hospital 1) with that at a similar neighbouring hospital (Hospital 2) that independently integrated the SSC with pre-existing practice. This was a prospective, observational study. One hundred operations were observed at each hospital. We recorded: compliance with administration of SSC domains (Sign In, Time Out and Sign Out) and individual domain items; timing of domain administration; and operating room team engagement during administration. Domain compliance at Hospital 1 and Hospital 2, respectively, was: 96% and 31% (p<0.0005) for Sign In; 99% and 48% (p<0.0005) for Time Out and 22% and 9% (p=0.008) for Sign Out. Engagement of two or more teams during Sign In and Time Out occurred more frequently at Hospital 2 than at Hospital 1. Compliance with administration of SSC domains was lower at Hospital 2 which introduced the SSC outside the context of a strict study protocol. This finding mandates caution in extrapolation of benefits identified in SSC studies to non-study hospitals. Staff engagement was better at Hospital 2 where checklist administration leadership is strategically shared among anaesthetic, surgical and nursing team members as compared with exclusive nursing leadership at Hospital 1. Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: Ref: ACTRN12612000135819, http://www.anzctr.org.au/trial_view.aspx?ID=362007.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11055/220
DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001749
PubMed URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23840072
Journal Title: BMJ quality & safety
Type: Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Appears in Collections:Scholarly and Clinical

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.