AIRR - ANZCA Institutional Research Repository
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11055/226
Title: Validation of a measurement tool for self-assessment of teamwork in intensive care.
Authors: Weller, J
Shulruf, B
Torrie, J
Frengley, R
Boyd, M
Paul, A
Yee, B
Dzendrowskyj, P
ANZCA/FPM Author: Weller, J
Torrie, J
Frengley, R
Yee, B
Dzendrowskyj, P
Issue Date: Sep-2013
Citation: British journal of anaesthesia 2013-09; 111(3): 460-7
Abstract: Teamwork is an important contributor to patient safety and a validated teamwork measurement tool could help healthcare teams identify areas for improvement and measure progress. We explored the psychometric properties of a teamwork measurement tool when used for self-assessment. We hypothesized that the tool had a valid factor structure and that scores from participants and external assessors would correlate. Forty intensive care teams (one doctor, three nurses) participated in four simulated emergencies, and each independently rated their team's performance at the end of each case using the teamwork measurement tool, without prior training in the use of the tool. We used exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and compared factor structure between participants and external assessors (using previously reported data). Scores from participants and external assessors were compared using Pearson's correlation coefficient. EFA demonstrated items loaded onto three distinct factors which were supported by the CFA. We found significant correlations between external and participant scores for overall teamwork scores and the three factors. Participants agreed with external assessors on the ranking of overall team performance but scored themselves significantly higher than external assessors. The teamwork measurement tool has a valid structure when used for self-assessment. Participant and external assessor scores correlated significantly, suggesting that participants could discriminate between different levels of performance, although leniency in self-assessed scores indicated the need for calibration. This tool could help structure reflection on teamwork and potentially facilitate self-directed, workplace-based improvement in teamwork.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11055/226
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet060
PubMed URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23558846
Journal Title: British journal of anaesthesia
Type: Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Validation Studies
Appears in Collections:Scholarly and Clinical

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.