AIRR - ANZCA Institutional Research Repository
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11055/475
Title: Perceptions of purpose, value, and process of the mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise in anesthesia training.
Authors: Castanelli, DJ
Jowsey, Tanisha
Chen, Yan
Weller, JM
ANZCA/FPM Author: Castanelli, DJ
Weller, JM
Issue Date: Dec-2016
Citation: Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie 2016-12; 63(12): 1345-1356
Abstract: Workplace-based assessment is integral to programmatic assessment in a competency-based curriculum. In 2013, one such assessment, a mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) with a novel "entrustability scale", became compulsory for over 1,200 Australia and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA) trainees. We explored trainees' and supervisors' understanding of the mini-CEX, their experience with the assessment, and their perceptions of its influence on learning and supervision. We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with anesthesia supervisors and trainees and performed an inductive thematic analysis of the verbatim transcripts. Eighteen supervisors and 17 trainees participated (n = 35). Interrelated themes concerned the perceived purpose of the mini-CEX, its value in trainee learning and supervision, and the process of performing the assessment. While few participants saw the mini-CEX primarily as an administrative burden, most focused on its potential for facilitating trainee improvement and reported positive impacts on the quantity and quality of feedback, trainee learning, and supervision. Finding time to schedule assessments and deliver timely feedback proved to be difficult in busy clinical workplaces. Views on case selection were divided and driven by contrasting goals - i.e., receiving useful feedback on challenging cases or receiving a high score by choosing lenient assessors or easy cases. Whether individual mini-CEXs were summative or formative was subject to intense debate, while the intended summative use of multiple mini-CEXs in programmatic assessment was poorly understood. Greater clarity of purpose and consistency of time commitment are necessary to embed the mini-CEX in the culture of the workplace, to realize the full potential for trainee learning, and to reach decisions on trainee progression.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11055/475
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-016-0740-9
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5377-809X
PubMed URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663452
Journal Title: Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie
Type: Journal Article
Appears in Collections:Scholarly and Clinical

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.