AIRR - ANZCA Institutional Research Repository
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11055/628
Title: Identifying and acting on inappropriate metadata: a critique of the Grattan Institute Report on questionable care in Australian hospitals.
Authors: Cooper, PD
Smart, DR
Keywords: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy
Economics
Critical appraisal
Evidence
Policy
Data
Issue Date: 2017
Citation: 47(1):44-54
Abstract: In an era of ever-increasing medical costs, the identification and prohibition of ineffective medical therapies is of considerable economic interest to healthcare funding bodies. Likewise, the avoidance of interventions with an unduly elevated clinical risk/benefit ratio would be similarly advantageous for patients. Regrettably, the identification of such therapies has proven problematic. A recent paper from the Grattan Institute in Australia (identifying five hospital procedures as having the potential for disinvestment on these grounds) serves as a timely illustration of the difficulties inherent in non-clinicians attempting to accurately recognize such interventions using non-clinical, indirect or poorly validated datasets.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11055/628
PubMed URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28357824
Journal Title: Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine
Type: Journal Article
Affiliates: Department of Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, Royal Hobart Hospital
Study/Trial: Case Control Studies
Appears in Collections:Scholarly and Clinical

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.