AIRR - ANZCA Institutional Research Repository
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11055/771
Title: Measuring the anaesthesia clinical learning environment at the department level is feasible and reliable
Authors: Castanelli DJ
Smith NA
ANZCA/FPM Author: Castanelli, DJ
Smith, NA
Keywords: anesthetics
anaesthesia
educational assessment
graduate medical education
learning environment
Issue Date: 2017
Citation: 118(5):733-9.
Abstract: Background. The learning environment describes the context and culture in which trainees learn. In order to establish the feasibility and reliability of measuring the anaesthetic learning environment in individual departments we implemented a previously developed instrument in hospitals across New South Wales. Methods. We distributed the instrument to trainees from 25 anaesthesia departments and supplied summarized results to individual departments. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed to assess internal structure validity and generalizability theory was used to calculate reliability. The number of trainees required for acceptable precision in results was determined using the standard error of measurement. Results. We received 172 responses (59% response rate). Suitable internal structure validity was confirmed. Measured reliability was acceptable (G-coefficient 0.69) with nine trainees per department. Eight trainees were required for a 95% confidence interval of plus or minus 0.25 in the mean total score. Eight trainees as assessors also allow a 95% confidence interval of approximately plus or minus 0.3 in the subscale mean scores. Results for individual departments varied, with scores below the expected level recorded on individual subscales, particularly the ‘teaching’ subscale. Conclusions. Our results confirm that, using this instrument, individual departments can obtain acceptable precision in results with achievable trainee numbers. Additionally, with the exception of departments with few trainees, implementation proved feasible across a training region. Repeated use would allow departments or accrediting bodies to monitor their individual learning environment and the impact of changes such as the introduction of new curricular elements, or local initiatives to improve trainee experience.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11055/771
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex037
Journal Title: British Journal of Anaesthesia
Type: Journal Article
Affiliates: Monash Hospital
Wollongong Hospital
Study/Trial: Reproducibility of Results
Appears in Collections:Scholarly and Clinical

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
BJA pdf May 2017.pdf
  Restricted Access
216.77 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.