AIRR - ANZCA Institutional Research Repository
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11055/802
Title: The effect of preload on electromyographic train of four ratios at the first dorsal interosseous muscle during spontaneous recovery from neuromuscular block
Authors: Bansal A
Stewart PA
Phillips S
Liang S
Wang X
ANZCA/FPM Author: Liang, SS
Phillips, S
Stewart, PA
Keywords: Neuromuscular Blockade
Delayed Emergence from Anesthesia
Electromyography
Neuromuscular Monitoring
Preload
Neuromuscular
Anesthesia
Anesthesiology
Issue Date: Nov-2018
Citation: 46(6):614-619.
Abstract: Accurate and reliable quantitative neuromuscular function monitoring is desirable for the optimal management of neuromuscular blockade, selection of the most appropriate reversal agent and dosage, and assessing the completeness of reversal to exclude residual neuromuscular blockade. Applying preload to the thumb may affect the precision of electromyography. This study compared the precision and agreement of electromyography with and without preload during recovery from non-depolarising neuromuscular blockade. After induction of anaesthesia and before neuromuscular blockade, the supramaximal current required at the first dorsal interosseous muscle with and without preload was determined. During recovery, train-of-four ratios were recorded using electromyography every 20 seconds. Alternating pairs of measurements (with and without preload) were obtained until spontaneous recovery was achieved. The preload device applied a resting tension of 75–150 g to the thumb. Bland–Altman analysis for repeated measurements was used to assess precision and agreement of electromyography responses with and without muscle preload. Two hundred and seventy-five sets of repeated measurements were collected from 35 participants. The repeatability coefficient for train-of-four ratios recorded by electromyography with a preload was 0.030 (95% confidence intervals, CI, 0.028 to 0.031) versus 0.068 (95% CI 0.064 to 0.072) without. Train-of-four ratios with preload demonstrated a bias of +0.038 (95% CI 0.037 to 0.042) compared to electromyography without, with 95% limits of agreement of 0.035–0.111. Preload significantly improved the precision of electromyographic train-of-four ratios, with 95% of consecutive measurements differing by less than 3%. Furthermore, electromyography with preload demonstrated a positive bias of 0.04 compared with electromyography alone, the clinical significance of which requires further research.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11055/802
ORCID: 0000-0002-7938-9367
PubMed URL: https://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.anzca.edu.au/pubmed/?term=30447672
ISSN: 0310-057X
Journal Title: Anaesthesia and intensive care
Type: Journal Article
Affiliates: The University of Sydney
Sydney Adventist Hosptial Clinical School
Study/Trial: Clinical Trial
Appears in Collections:Scholarly and Clinical

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
A& IC Preload Nov 2018.pdf
  Restricted Access
Anaes & Intensive Care 46 (6) 614-619. 2018813.72 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.