AIRR - ANZCA Institutional Research Repository
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11055/876
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSmith Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorFaux SGen_US
dc.contributor.authorGardner Ten_US
dc.contributor.authorHobbs MJen_US
dc.contributor.authorJames MAen_US
dc.contributor.authorJoubert AEen_US
dc.contributor.authorKladnitski Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorNewby JMen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchultz Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorShiner CTen_US
dc.contributor.authorAndrews Gen_US
dc.date2019-09-09-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-11T00:53:15Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-11T00:53:15Z-
dc.identifier.citationSep 9. pii: pnz20; [Epub ahead of print]en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11055/876-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Chronic pain is a prevalent and burdensome condition. Reboot Online was developed to address treatment barriers traditionally associated with accessing face-to-face chronic pain management programs. It is a comprehensive multidisciplinary online treatment program, based on an existing and effective face-to-face multidisciplinary pain program (the Reboot program). DESIGN & PARTICIPANTS: A CONSORT-compliant randomized controlled trial was conducted, enrolling adults who had experienced pain for three months or longer. METHODS: Participants were randomly allocated to either an eight-lesson multidisciplinary pain management program, Reboot Online (N = 41), or to a usual care (UC) control group (N = 39). Clinical oversight was provided by a multidisciplinary team remotely, including physiotherapists and clinical psychologists. Participants were measured at baseline, post-treatment (week 16), and three-month follow-up (week 28). RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analyses revealed that Reboot Online was significantly more effective than UC at increasing pain self-efficacy (g = 0.69) at post-treatment, and these gains were maintained at follow-up. Similarly, Reboot Online was significantly more effective than UC on several secondary measures at post-treatment and follow-up, including movement-based fear avoidance and pain-related disability, but it did not significantly reduce pain interference or depression compared with UC. Clinician input was minimal, and adherence to Reboot Online was moderate, with 61% of participants (N = 25) completing all eight lessons. CONCLUSIONS: Reboot Online presents a novel approach to multidisciplinary pain management and offers an accessible, efficacious alternative and viable treatment option for chronic pain management.en_US
dc.subjectChronic Painen_US
dc.subjectinterneten_US
dc.subjectPain Managementen_US
dc.subjectonline treatmenten_US
dc.subjecttelehealthen_US
dc.titleReboot Online: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing an Online Multidisciplinary Pain Management Program with Usual Care for Chronic Pain.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.journaltitlePain Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/pm/pnz208en_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=31498393en_US
dc.type.studyortrialCase Control Studiesen_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Scholarly and Clinical
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

34
checked on Mar 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.