AIRR - ANZCA Institutional Research Repository
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11055/1001
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTan Nicole Len_US
dc.contributor.authorGotmaker Roberten_US
dc.contributor.authorBarrington Michael Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-07T05:34:02Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-07T05:34:02Z-
dc.date.issued2019-12-
dc.identifier.citation2019 Dec;129(6):1715-1722.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1526-7598en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11055/1001-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) is commonly used in anterior total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery; however, evidence for its efficacy is lacking. We hypothesized that LIA with 0.2% ropivacaine when compared with injection of placebo (0.9% saline) would improve patient quality of recovery on postoperative day (POD) 1, as measured by the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score. Methods: Patients scheduled to have a primary unilateral anterior THA with a single surgeon in a tertiary level metropolitan hospital were randomized to receive LIA with either 2.5 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine or 0.9% saline as placebo. Patients and clinical and study personnel were blinded to group allocation. Perioperative care was standardized and this included spinal anesthesia and oral multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome was a multidimensional (pain, physical comfort, physical independence, emotions, and psychological support) patient-reported quality of recovery scale, QoR-15, measured on POD 1. Results: One hundred sixty patients were randomized; 6 patients were withdrawn after randomization and 2 patients had incomplete outcome data. The intention-to-treat analysis included 152 patients. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) QoR-15 score on POD 1 of the ropivacaine group was 119.5 (102-124), compared with the placebo group which had a median (IQR) of 115 (98-126). The median difference of 2 (95% confidence interval [CI], -4 to 7; P = .56) was not statistically or clinically significant. An as-per-protocol sensitivity analysis of 146 patients who received spinal anesthesia without general anesthesia, and the allocated intervention, also showed no evidence of a significant difference between groups. Secondary outcomes (worst pain numerical rating scale at rest and with movement on POD 1, opioid consumption on PODs 1 and 2, mobilization on POD 1, Brief Pain Inventory severity and interference on POD 90, and length of stay) were similar in both groups. Conclusions: LIA with 0.2% ropivacaine when compared with 0.9% saline as placebo did not improve quality of recovery 1 day after anterior THA.en_US
dc.subjectLocal infiltration analgesiaen_US
dc.subjectanterior total hip arthroplastyen_US
dc.subjectRopivacaineen_US
dc.subjectAnalgesiaen_US
dc.titleImpact of local infiltration analgesia on the quality of recovery after anterior total hip arthroplasty: a randomised, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trialen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleAnesth Analgen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1213/ANE.0000000000004255en_US
dc.description.affiliatesEpworth HealthCare, Melbourneen_US
dc.description.affiliatesUniversity of Melbourneen_US
dc.description.affiliatesSt Vincent's Hospital, Melbourneen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31743193/en_US
dc.type.studyortrialRandomized Controlled Clinical Trial/Controlled Clinical Trialen_US
dc.ispartof.anzcaresearchfoundationYesen_US
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Scholarly and Clinical
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

324
checked on May 23, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.