AIRR - ANZCA Institutional Research Repository
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11055/1319
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGraydon Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorStricker PAen_US
dc.contributor.authorKelleher Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorCravero Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorKarim Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorMuhly WTen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee-Archer Pen_US
dc.date2025-04-14-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-18T03:31:33Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-18T03:31:33Z-
dc.date.issued2025-08-01-
dc.identifier.citation143(2):275-286.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11055/1319-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Measuring the quality of a patient’s recovery is vital, and reliable patient-centered outcome metrics are needed for clinical investigations and quality improvement. Currently, assessment tools to measure quality of recovery in pediatric patients are lacking. This study aimed to develop a scale to assess the quality of recovery construct in pediatric patients. Methods: Using a mixed-methods investigative model, item generation was achieved using two complementary approaches. First, a comprehensive review of the literature identified tools and questions that assessed the endpoints relevant to recovery in children. Questions were categorized and then assessed by an expert Delphi panel who determined the most significant domains and items to be included. Concurrently, semistructured interviews were conducted with patients and their families to identify themes related to recovery that were important to patients and families. The resulting pilot questionnaire was administered to patients and their families presenting for elective surgery in the United States and Australia. Results: The literature search identified 41 instruments, comprising 216 questions relevant to recovery. After the initial Delphi round, the item list was reduced to 91 questions, and then to 50 questions after the second round. The themes identified in the semistructured interviews aligned with domains considered important by a panel of experts. A 50-item questionnaire was administered to 1,162 children at multiple timepoints after surgery. Item reduction and factor analysis resulted in the 20-item Pediatric Scale for Quality of Recovery that assesses the domains relevant to physical and psychologic recovery. Conclusions: The Pediatric Scale for Quality of Recovery scale is a 20-item questionnaire designed to provide a holistic representation of a child’s physical, emotional, and psychologic recovery after surgery and anesthesia. It was developed and validated with consumer involvement and a strong patient-centered focus. Once further validation has been established, it is expected to become a standardized endpoint in pediatric perioperative trials and quality improvement projects.en_US
dc.subjectAnesthesia Recovery Perioden_US
dc.titleDevelopment of the Pediatric Scale for Quality of Recovery (PedSQoR)en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleAnesthesiologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/ALN.0000000000005503en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesAnesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvaniaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvaniaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusettsen_US
dc.description.affiliatesHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusettsen_US
dc.description.affiliatesSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australiaen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40227959/en_US
dc.type.studyortrialProspective Cohort Studyen_US
dc.type.specialtyAnaesthesiaen_US
dc.identifier.fulltextlinkhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12227209/en_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Scholarly and Clinical
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

162
checked on May 23, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.