AIRR - ANZCA Institutional Research Repository
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11055/878
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMurnion BPen_US
dc.contributor.authorRivas Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorDemirkol Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorHayes Ven_US
dc.contributor.authorLintzeris Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorNielsen Sen_US
dc.date2019-08-24-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-11T02:44:26Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-11T02:44:26Z-
dc.identifier.citationAug 24. pii: pnz178; [Epub ahead of print]en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11055/878-
dc.description.abstractAbstract OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to identify the analgesic efficacy of three different pharmacological strategies in patients receiving methadone or buprenorphine as opioid agonist treatment (OAT). The three pharmacological approaches, a) increasing maintenance methadone/buprenorphine dose by 30%, b) adding oxycodone, or c) adding a single dose of gabapentin, were compared with a control condition of the participant's usual OAT dose. DESIGN: A randomized, controlled, double-blinded, double-dummy, within-subject crossover study. SUBJECTS: Nine participants on stable doses of methadone and eight participants on stable doses of buprenorphine were recruited. SETTING: An outpatient opioid treatment clinic in inner city Sydney, Australia. METHODS: The cold pressor tolerance test was used to examine experimental pain threshold and tolerance. Ratings of subjective drug effects and safety measures (physiological and cognitive) were assessed. RESULTS: There was no difference in the primary outcome measures of pain thresholds or tolerance between the conditions examined. Interindividual variability was evident. Differences in some subjective measures were identified, including lower pain recall, lower "bad effects," and higher global satisfaction in the additional methadone condition. In the buprenorphine arm, increased drug liking and "bad effects" were detected with oxycodone administration, while increased subjective intoxication was identified with gabapentin. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of an objective improvement in analgesia with any condition compared with control. Further research is required to optimize pain management strategies in this population.en_US
dc.subjectbuprenorphineen_US
dc.subjectgabapentinen_US
dc.subjectmethadoneen_US
dc.subjectoxycodoneen_US
dc.subjectpainen_US
dc.titleAcute Experimental Pain Responses in Methadone- and Buprenorphine/Naloxone-Maintained Patients Administered Additional Opioid or Gabapentin: A Double-Blind Crossover Pilot Study.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.journaltitlePain Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/pm/pnz178en_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=31504868en_US
dc.type.studyortrialStudyen_US
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Scholarly and Clinical
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

348
checked on May 23, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.